Bottle bills Deposit Systems are a proven, sustainable method of acquiring used beverage bottles and cans for recycling.
www.Bottlebill.co.uk

"Return to Vendor"

Bottle bills Deposit Systems are a proven, sustainable method of acquiring used beverage bottles and cans for recycling.
Home
Browse
Reviews
Site Map
About Us
Contact Us
Bottle bills Deposit Systems are a proven, sustainable method of acquiring used beverage bottles and cans for recycling.
 Latest News
Call for packaging deposit scheme for Scotland
                 more info »
 
Bottle bills Deposit Systems are a proven, sustainable method of acquiring used beverage bottles and cans for recycling.

Reverse Vending Comes to Scotland


                 more info »

 
 
Reverse Vending in Wales
                 more info »
 
 Latest News

Reverse Vending Corporation is the leading UK distributor and operator of Reverse Vending Machines that utilise advanced technology to identify, sort, collect and process used beverage containers – cans, PET plastic bottles and cartons

 

UK Bottle Bill Information!

www.reverse-vending-england.co.uk/ www.reverse-vending-scotland.co.uk/ www.reverse-vending-ireland.co.uk/ www.reverse-vending-northern-ireland.co.uk/ www.reverse-vending-wales.co.uk/ www.reverse-vending-malta.co.uk/

Front of Store

Reverse Vending in Ireland

Reverse Vending Corporation

Reverse Vending

Revend

Reverse Vending Systems

Reverse Vending Corporation

Recycling in Wales

Recycling in Schools

Deposit System

Renewable Vending Machines

Reverse Vending Association

Reverse Vending Systems

UK Industry Directory

Renewable Vending Machines

Welcome To www.bottlebill.co.uk

Bottle bills (Deposit Systems) are a proven, sustainable method of acquiring used beverage bottles and cans for recycling. The refund (deposit) value of the container provides a monetary incentive to return the container for recycling.

In Germany the term pfand is used " Pfand means deposit"

Cash for your Empties?

People in the UK may be unfamiliar with this concept and the idea of a 'bottlebill'.

A bottlebill is a law which requires retailers to take a deposit for beer or soft drink bottles which is then refunded when the empties are returned to encourage a high rate of recycling.

The idea started back in the 50's and was aimed at reducing costs for companies by producing less bottles and also to reduce the amount of rubbish in the waste stream.

Many US states and various European countries use this system but it doesn't ever seem to have been implemented as a recycling method in the UK. Would it work if introduced? Would you take back your empties for cash?

 
 
Latest News
 
Deposit schemes
By John Bingham and Louise Gray
09 March 2009
 

The report calls for the UK to adopt bottle and can collection schemes similar to those already in use in New York and elsewhere.

Deposit schemes, where customers take back bottles or cans for a small refund, were common in the UK up until the 1980s but phased out with the introduction of cheaper containers like plastic.

The system has been reintroduced in many US states including New York State, South Australia and European countries including Germany, Sweden and Denmark.

"Bottle deposit schemes are working well in New York State, slashing litter levels and boosting recycling," said Mr Bryson.

"Surely a no-brainer then to introduce a similar system in the UK, which research shows would be supported by 80 per cent of people?

"And yet the Government seems intent on finding reasons why such a system might cause problems, whether for industry or local councils.

"The fact of the matter is the recycling rate for this country, while much improved in recent years, still lags behind many of our European partners and we are world leaders in litter."

More >>
 
Monday 9 March 2009
Study claims deposit schemes in Europe and US have help cut litter levels 80 per cent, say staff at BusinessGreen.com
 

Bottle deposit schemes are working well in New York State, slashing litter levels and boosting recycling," he wrote. "Another 10 or so US states operate similar systems, as do South Australia and European countries such as Germany, Denmark and Sweden. All report significantly increased recycling rates."

He added that the introduction of such a scheme in the UK was a "no-brainer" that polls show would enjoy 80 per cent public support and would help the UK bolster recycling rates that still lag behind those in Europe.

Ben Caldecott, head of Policy Exchange's environment and energy unit, said that evidence from the New York scheme showed that deposits had helped to reduce consumer litter by 80 per cent since its introduction in 1983 More >>

 
 
Recycle blitz targets shops, offices and parks
Published Date: 29 July 2008
By Jenny Haworth
NEW laws could make it illegal not to have recycling facilities in workplaces and public areas, including shopping centres, lay-bys and beaches.
The Scottish Government says 80 per cent of people now recycle at home, and it wants to make sure they do not have to change their habits when they go to work or out for the day.
Legislation, out for consultation, could be brought in that applies to retailers, shopping centres, airports, beaches, car parks, cinemas, entertainment sites, parks, lay-bys, sports stadia and government buildings. Owners or occupiers would have to provide recycling facilities, arrange for material to be taken away and keep track of amounts collected.
If they failed to comply, they could be penalised.
The measures, aimed at helping Scotland come close to being a zero-waste country, were welcomed by environment groups.

However, there are concerns among businesses worried about being penalised if they fail to comply.

Other measures considered in the report include setting new targets for reducing packaging and forcing companies to buy recycled materials. It also suggests bringing back "deposit and reward" schemes to pay consumers for returning bottles.

Richard Lochhead, the environment secretary, said in the consultation document that he was aiming to change the way Scotland regards its waste.

"Moving towards a zero-waste society will ensure we obtain greater economic, social and environmental value from the resources which have been considered to be waste," he said.

He added that the Scottish Government believes legislation may play a part. "Other countries in the EU – with higher recycling rates than Scotland – have legislation in place to encourage environmentally sustainable behaviour by business, retailers, the public sector and individuals," he said.

The measures would help meet the 2025 targets of 70 per cent of waste being recycled, and municipal waste sent to landfill to be cut to 5 per cent.

Andy Wilcox, Scottish policy convener at the Federation of Small Businesses, said he was concerned about "unintended consequences". He added: "Too often, we have seen 'one-size-fits-all' legislation which unfairly discriminates against Scotland's smaller businesses."

However, Duncan McLaren, director of Friends of the Earth Scotland, believes legislation is necessary. He said: "To get the consistency that means people can be confident they will always be able to recycle, I think the legal approach is justified."

He wants mandatory waste targets for businesses.

Iain Gulland, director of the Waste and Resources Action Programme for Scotland, said it made sense for recycling facilities to be put in areas where they were needed. "It's clear, especially with aluminium cans, for example, that most are drunk away from the home," he said. More >>

 
 
Lochhead backs recycling bid

Published Date: 28 July 2008

Scottish Government proposals that aim to cut waste and increase the amount of rubbish that is recycled could make a "real difference", Environment Secretary Richard Lochhead said.

Ministers are looking at increasing recycling facilities at sports grounds, shopping centres, beaches and cinemas.

And plans to bring back "deposit and return" schemes, where shoppers get money back if they bring back empty bottles, are also being considered.

These could include "reverse vending machines", where a people feeds the empty bottle or container into a machine in return for a financial reward.
 
 
Changes could make a real difference – Holyrood minister


Recycling rewards considered

Published: 28/07/2008

Scottish Government proposals that aim to cut waste and increase the amount of rubbish that is recycled could make a “real difference”, Environment Secretary Richard Lochhead said yesterday.

Ministers are looking at increasing recycling facilities at sports grounds, shopping centres, beaches and cinemas.

And plans to bring back “deposit and return” schemes, where shoppers get money back if they bring back empty bottles, are also being considered.

These could include “reverse vending machines”, where people feed the empty bottle or container into a machine in return for a financial reward.

Mr Lochhead said: “A fresh look at deposit and return schemes, including hi-tech ‘reverse vending machines’ are a real possibility and could double the number of bottles recycled in Scotland.

“They could also be used for other drinks containers, as well as food tins and aluminium, takeaway trays.”

The government is carrying out a consultation on the proposals, which form part of its ambition for a “Zero Waste” Scotland.

And Mr Lochhead said: “The government is committed to achieving a recycling rate of 70% and cutting municipal waste sent to landfill to 5% by 2025.”

Mr Lochhead said to achieve that, Scots must cut unnecessary use of raw materials, help prevent waste and use more recycled material. He went on: “I am also keen to explore the greater role that businesses and public bodies can play in terms of providing recycling facilities, particularly at large public events.

“The government is currently looking at other ways to increase recycling in the workplace.

“There are proposals on packaging and on carrier bags which we are also looking at as part of the Zero Waste Retailers Group.”

Dr Dan Barlow, the head of policy at the environmental charity WWF Scotland, said: “Measures to increase the levels of waste recycled by businesses and public bodies coupled with initiatives to ensure the purchase of recycled products would help drive down the amounts of waste dumped in landfills.

“Deposit and return systems which encourage refilling and recycling of cans and bottles have been shown to work very successfully.”

WWF Scotland is calling for waste prevention schemes to be given a greater priority, and also wants to see an end to excessive packaging.

Dr Barlow said: “Reducing the amount of waste we produce coupled to achieving much higher levels of recycling are essential if Scotland is to achieve its zero waste ambition.”

 
 
Scotland considers "Zero Waste" legislation

28-07-2008

Businesses in Scotland could be legally required to provide recycling facilities under a bold new set of legislative proposals unveiled by the Scottish Government today (July 28).

Ministers are seeking opinions from both the public and private sector on a range of measures that will form part of possible legislation to be included in the Scottish Climate Change Bill, which is expected to go to the Scottish Parliament before the end of 2008.

 

Richard Lochhead is responsible for helping Scotland to work towards its 'Zero Waste' goal
The proposals feature a marked focus on the part that businesses and public sector bodies can play in helping the country to reach its ambitious recycling and landfill diversion goals as it works towards a 'Zero Waste' Scotland, and will work alongside the ongoing revision to Scotland's National Waste Management Plan.

Most significantly, both businesses and public sector organisations with operations over a certain size would be required to provide recycling facilities, as well as arranging for and keeping records of the materials collected and when and where they are sent for reuse.

And, any body that failed to comply with the regulations could face penalties or sanctions, with local authorities likely to be given the principle enforcement role.

The consultation also suggests that the regulations could "give local authorities powers to require recycling facilities to be provided in certain locations in private ownership in their areas which regularly attract large numbers of the public, for example, at sports, recreational or entertainment facilities or events."

Announcing the proposals, the Scottish cabinet secretary for the environment, Richard Lochhead said: "I am also keen to explore the greater role that businesses and public bodies can play in terms of providing recycling facilities, particularly at large public events such as football matches and music festivals - but also at company offices.

"The Scottish government is currently looking at other ways to increase recycling in the workplace," he added.

If introduced, the measures would represent a significantly stronger stance on non-household recycling than south of the border, and the Scottish government could run the risk of angering businesses who are already suffering in the current financial downturn.
Packaging

The focus on business is continued in the document's proposals for legislation relating to packaging, and in particular the issue of retailers' concentrating on 'back of store' packaging waste, rather than 'front of store' waste in order to achieve their producer responsibilities under the EU Packaging Directive.

As a result, it suggests that regulations could be introduced to set statutory targets on packaging reduction, as well as requiring retailers to provide data on the amount of packaging they use on goods sold to consumers.

And, it again suggests that non-compliance could result in potential penalties or sanctions, with enforcement undertaken by the Scottish Environment Protection Authority (SEPA) or councils.

Further proposals for businesses and public bodies include attempting to promote markets for products made from recycled materials by requiring them to specify a minimum percentage of material made from recyclate in their contract procurement processes.

And, with a view to addressing commercial and industrial waste, the government proposes to require public sector bodies and businesses to introduce waste management plans, encouraging waste prevention and sustainable waste management.
Ambitious

Mr Lochhead explained that the set of proposals reflected the fact that Scotland needed to do more to reach its ambitious target for a 70% recycling rate and landfill rate of just 5% by 2025 (see letsrecycle.com story).

"The time is now right for a major push towards making these targets a reality to help limit the effects of climate change. To do this we must reduce the unnecessary use of raw materials, prevent waste and use more recycling material," he said.

Figures published in May 2008 indicated that Scotland's recycling rate grew by 4.1% between 2006 and 2007, to 31.2%, leading to questions being asked about just how achievable the government's ambitious targets actually were (see letsrecycle.com story).
Bottles

Away from businesses and the public sector, the proposals focus on the introduction of a nationwide 'deposit and return' scheme for bottles, in an attempt to increase levels of recycling and, more importantly, reuse.

Scotland currently recycles less than 40% of its glass bottles and 35% of household plastic bottles, and Mr Lochhead explained that charging consumers a deposit for bottles that they would be repaid on return could significantly boost rates of reuse and recycling.

"While these figures are undoubtedly an improvement on where we once were, there is still more we can do," he said.

"A fresh look at deposit and return schemes, including hi-tech 'reverse vending machines' are a real possibility and could double the number of bottles recycled in Scotland. They could also be used for other drinks containers, as well as food tins and aluminium trays from takeaways," he added.
Milk

Traditionally, reuse of bottles was widespread throughout the UK, from 'deposit and return' schemes for lemonade bottles to return of glass milk bottles to milkmen.

However, these practices have become less common, with glass milk bottles replaced by plastic bottles brought from supermarkets, and the number of voluntary 'deposit and return' schemes steadily reducing.

And, last February, drinks manufacturer Britvic ended its reusable bottle scheme for pubs and clubs, opting to introduce single-use glass bottles instead (see letsrecycle.com story).


Denmark

Some 'deposit and return' schemes do still operate on a small, voluntary scale in the UK, while a statutory system is in place in Denmark, where deposits have to paid on all cans and bottles containing beer, cider, soft drinks, alcopops and energy drinks.

With the system in place, the Scandinavian nation has achieved a return rate of 85% for bottles for recycling, with nearer 100% of bottles designed for reuse returned, and is planning to roll it out to mineral water, lemonade and iced tea from December 2008.

The level of deposit is set by the Danish ministry of the environment, and any similar scheme introduced in Scotland would need to meet EU obligations.
Feedback

Encouraging consultees to offer feedback on the proposed legislation, Mr Lochhead said: "The proposals we are consulting on today could make a real difference in achieving our goals of a 'Zero Waste' Scotland. I want to hear from anyone with an interest in waste and recycling including businesses, public bodies and individual Scots.

"We all have a role to play in ensuring Scotland becomes a cleaner, greener place and dealing with our waste responsibly is a huge part of that," he added.

The deadline for responses to the consultation is October 6 2008.

 
 
Scotland proposes bottle deposit schemes

Liz Gyekye 28 Jul 2008

People could be paid for recycling their bottles under new plans unveiled by the Scottish Government designed to increase recycling.

The proposal forms part of the Scottish Government’s ambition for a ‘Zero Waste’ Scotland.

Launching the consultation, Environment Secretary Richard Lochhead said that the “Scottish Government is committed to achieving a recycling rate of 70% and cutting municipal waste sent to landfill to 5% by 2025.”

He said to achieve this Scotland must reduce the “unnecessary use of raw materials, prevent waste and use more recycled material”.

“A fresh look at deposit and return schemes, including hi-tech ‘reverse vending machines’ are a real possibility and could double the number of bottles recycled in Scotland. They could also be used for other drinks containers, as well as food tins and aluminium, takeaway trays.”

Lochhead said that he estimated that 30 to 40% of glass bottles are recycled in Scotland and about 35% of household plastic bottles are recycled. But he said that there was more to do.

He is also eager to increase recycling facilities at sports grounds, shopping centres, beaches and cinemas.

Lochhead explained: “I am also keen to explore the greater role that businesses and public bodies can play in terms of providing recycling facilities, particularly at large public events such as football matches and music festivals – but also at company offices. The Scottish Government is currently looking at other ways to increase recycling in the workplace.

“There are proposals on packaging and on carrier bags which we are also looking at as part of the Zero Waste Retailers Group.

“The proposals we are consulting on today could make a real difference in achieving our goals of a ‘Zero Waste’ Scotland. I want to hear from anyone with an interest in waste and recycling including businesses, public bodies and individual Scots.”

The results of the consultation will form part of possible legislation to be included in the Climate Change Bill. More >>

 
Bottle recyclers 'could be paid'
People could be paid to return empty bottles under radical new Scottish Government plans aimed at boosting recycling levels.

The plans would see "deposit and return" schemes introduced, where shoppers would get money for bringing back bottles.

The ideas form part of a consultation on possible legislation which hopes to create a "zero waste" society.

Environment Secretary Richard Lochhead said fresh recycling ideas were needed.

Experts believe "deposit and return" schemes could significantly increase levels of recycling.

Mr Lochhead said: "The Scottish Government is committed to achieving a recycling rate of 70% and cutting municipal waste sent to landfill to 5% by 2025.

"The time is now right for a major push towards making these targets a reality to help limit the effects of climate change.

"To do this we must reduce the unnecessary use of raw materials, prevent waste and use more recycled material."

Such schemes used to operate on a non-statutory basis in Scotland, with consumers charged a deposit for some bottles, such as those for lemonade.

They got their deposit back when they returned the bottles, which were then sent back to the manufacturer for re-filling rather than recycling.

In Denmark, where the scheme is statutory, deposits apply to all cans and bottles containing beer, cider, soft drinks, alcopops and energy drinks.

Denmark's return rate for bottles for recycling is about 85%, and approaching about 100% for bottles designed for re-use.

The Scottish Government said the scheme could also be extended to other materials, including aluminium trays from takeaways and tin cans.

Financial reward

The use of high tech "reverse vending", where a consumer feeds the empty bottle or container into a machine for financial reward, is also being considered.

Mr Lochhead said that "deposit and return" schemes and "reverse vending" machines could double the number of bottles recycled in Scotland.

He said: "In Scotland, we estimate that currently around 30% to 40% of glass bottles are recycled and around 35% of household plastic bottles are recycled, using existing arrangements such as bottle banks in the street or elsewhere and kerbside collections.

"While these figures are undoubtedly an improvement on where we once were, there is still more we can do."

Dr Dan Barlow, head of policy for environment group WWF Scotland, welcomed the proposals.

He said: "Deposit and return systems which encourage refilling and recycling of cans and bottles have been shown to work very successfully elsewhere. We would support the introduction of a deposit return system in Scotland.

"Reducing the amount of waste we produce coupled to achieving much higher levels of recycling are essential if Scotland is to achieve its zero waste ambition."

The government said that any moves to introduce a statutory deposit and return system in Scotland would require close and further consultation with retailers and other bodies.

Any new statutory system would also need to be in line with Scotland's EU obligations.More >>

 
 
 
 
 

 


Bottle Bill - Deposit System in the UK

 

 

Lets Recycle

29th April 2008

Deposit

On Friday, Mrs Ruddock also commented on the possibility of a national deposit system for drinks containers to encourage the public to return them to where they were bought from, and thereby increase recycling.

This follows lobbying by the Campaign to Protect Rural England for a new bottle deposit law, in which consumers would pay 10p extra to buy drinks, which would then be refunded when they returned the container.

The charity claims that while the average household disposes of 500 plastic bottles a year, only 130 are currently recycled, meaning that 370 go to landfill or create litter.

Responding to a question raised by David Kidney, Labour MP for Stafford, Mrs Ruddock said that the government would look at deposit schemes as one of a "range of ideas to improve the collection of material for recycling, including drinks containers consumed inside and outside of the home."

However, she pointed out that such schemes had been unsuccessful in the past because they were uneconomic.

 

 

Edie (Environmental Data Interactive Exchange)

20 April 2008

CPRE call for bottle deposit scheme

CPRE president Bill Bryson and the Wombles launched the campaign in London's Leicester Square (Copyright CPRE)

Consumers could be paid for recycling their plastic bottles under a scheme proposed by the Campaign to Protect Rural England.

CPRE president Bill Bryson and the Wombles launched the campaign in London's Leicester Square (Copyright CPRE)

An extra 10 pence would be added to the cost of goods such as drinks which would be returned to the consumer after the bottle is taken to collection points.

The organisation is lobbying for the bottle deposit system as part of its three-year Stop the Drop campaign against litter and fly-tipping, which was launched by CPRE president and author Bill Bryson last week.

UK households use an average of 500 plastic bottles a year, and just 130 of these are recycled while the rest head for landfill or end up littering towns and countryside.

Earlier this year, an annual survey of local authorities by litter watchdog Encams revealed that average performance on cleaning up litter has slipped from satisfactory to unsatisfactory.

Stop the Drop campaigner Mardi MacGregor told edie: "No local authority is rated good, which is very disappointing, given that it's a statutory requirement."

Local authorities are also failing to punish offenders, despite being given powers to fine people for littering and fly-tipping, the CPRE said.

Mr Bryson said: "The total sum of fines for littering collected nationally last year was just slightly over £1.5m - or about one-fifteenth of what the London Borough of Kensington and Chelsea collects annually in parking fines.

"Of the 43,624 fines levied, only 26,818 were actually paid. And 72 out of 354 local authorities issued no penalties at all."

CPRE is calling for Government to set local authorities targets for clearing up litter and encourage them to punish offenders.

Miss MacGregor said: "From talking to local authorities they are actually quite supportive of our campaign.

"They find at the moment that they do not have the resources and litter is not a Government target so at the moment money is being diverted to other targets."

The organisation is also encouraging people to support its campaign by complaining to their local authority about litter.

Kate Martin

ARE WE LOSING OUR BOTTLE?

20 April 2008 - Eamonn Holmes

There's been a call this week for a deposit system on glass and plastic bottles and cans to help with litter and recycling. About time - but will it work?

When I was a youngster, returning bottles to shops was the norm and it was a great way of making money.

Down I'd go to the post office to buy my national savings stamps. But then 10p was two whole shillings. I doubt if a 10 pence refund will have quite the same allure for today's youngsters.

In my day the cash was the important thing - let's hope today's lot care more about the planet, because at that financial rate of return, that's probably all they'll be saving. MORE>>

 

 

Call for 10p deposit on plastic bottles to keep Britain tidy

Liz Gyekye
17 Apr 2008

An environmental charity is calling on the Government to introduce a deposit on plastic bottles and cans to help reduce litter that blights Britain’s streets.

The Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) is urging the Government to introduce a scheme which would pay out 10 pence for every drinks can and plastic water bottle recycled.

Launching a nationwide campaign to tackle litter and fly-tipping the group said that each household disposes of 500 plastic bottles per year. Only 130 of these are recycled per year while the rest end up in landfill or on the streets as litter. 

If the deposit scheme was implemented drinks manufacturers would add 10p to the price of every bottle or can sold. The consumer or whoever picked up the container from the street, would then collect the 10p deposit when they returned the bottle to the retailer or recycling collection point.

The manufacturer could make money from selling the containers for recycling, while cleaner streets would mean fewer costs to the taxpayer.

CPRE spokeswoman said: “Litter is so bad that people are now dropping litter and expecting someone else to clean it up. We have to reverse the mindset of people. If we did not drop litter we would not have to propose this scheme in the first place.

"The CPRE will be lobbying the Government for more leadership to tackle litter and fly-tipping.”
Similar schemes are already in place in south Australia, Germany, Sweden and the US, where 11 states have ‘bottle bills’ with a 5 cent deposit added to the price of each drink
.

Minster for Environment Joan Ruddock said: “Waste solutions have to make both environmental and economic sense if they are to be successful. Deposit and return schemes died out in this country because they did not make financial sense.

“Until their environmental benefits are more clear cut we are not currently persuaded that implementing them would be justified. We wouldn't entirely rule them out because we are looking at innovative ideas for better collection of materials that get discarded on the street.”

 

Campaigners call for bottle deposit law

Customers could be made to pay a deposit for bottles

Written by: Emma Eversham

The Campaign to Protect Rural England is putting pressure on the government to introduce a bottle deposit law to help clear the countryside of litter.

According to the CPRE, each household throws away 500 plastic bottles a year, but only recycles 130 of them – leaving 370 to go to landfill or litter the streets.

However, if drinks retailers added 10p to the price of bottles and refunded the customer when they returned it for recycling, the CPRE thinks it would lead to a cleaner environment.

CPRE president and author Bill Bryson said: “None of us need stand idly by as our towns and countryside are trashed. Of course it is vital that people do not drop litter in the first place, but local authorities, central government and other public bodies have a duty to clear it up and should all give a much stronger lead on the problem. We can all put pressure on them to do so.”

Deposit schemes are already in place in a number of countries, including Australia, Germany, Denmark and Sweden.

Joan Ruddock may bring back deposit charges for bottles

Valerie Elliott, Countryside Editor

Bottle deposit charges and cash in exchange for the return of used bottles and cans are being considered by Joan Ruddock, the Minister for Waste.

She has ordered a feasibility study after the call in The Times by Bill Bryson, president of the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE), for a national offensive to clear the highways and byways of litter blight.

He suggested redeemable deposits on every drink container sold because it gave litter a value and encouraged groups such as Scouts, the homeless, churches and others to use empties to raise funds. When deposits were introduced in Iowa 20 years ago litter was reduced by 70 per cent because people picked litter up in exchange for cash.

Ms Ruddock said: “I have asked officials to look at novel ways on how we deal with the worst litter offenders, which are bottles and cans. It may be possible to devise a scheme where people deposit used bottles and cans and get a reward. I can see the attraction of take-back schemes with a reward.”

She was particularly keen to explore possible use of vending machines to take back empties, she said. Leading manufacturers and reverse vending machine operators are to be consulted about such a plan.

Ms Ruddock said: “If only we could find a way of capturing the cans of those who drink in the street so they are not thrown on the street. If people consume on the street they are extremely unlikely to take empties home. We need to find more novel and creative ways instead of ending up with overflowing bins.”

She is particularly keen to develop a return scheme for soft drinks cans because the aluminium is expensive and can be used extensively in recycling.

She admitted there was much work to do to formulate new policies but she confirmed: “I am happy to look again at this issue. There was some work done a few years ago on deposit schemes but they were not seen as effective in encouraging recycling. But dealing with litter is different.”

The CPRE’s Stop the Drop campaign begins formally today. Hundreds of people have already pledged to help to clean up their community and nominations are being invited to identify “grot spots” nationwide.

Bryson makes clear in The Times today that he does not expect people to challenge litter louts directly and risk abuse or injury.

His call to action is not about vigilantism, though he admitted that he had a confrontation recently with a young man who had thrown the left-overs of his fish and chip supper near Victoria station in London.

He said: “Son, you know you live in a really beautiful country, you ought to love it . . . I thought ‘He’s going to deck me’.”

But the lout agreed, admitted he was drunk and picked up the wrappers. In other cases Bryson has been wary. He said: “I haven't said anything to them because they do it in such a conspicuous way they’re making a statement and it’s not worth getting knifed or punched in the face.”

He is also not banking on signing up the National Trust to his crusade after disclosing details of a recent run-in with the country's biggest landowner.

He is horrified about the amount of litter blighting the Trust’s Dovedale estate in the south Peak District and at a Trust car park along the South Downs Way.

He has already written to ask the Trust to install litter bins at Dovedale but his request was refused.

Bryson said: “It feels that litter bins attract more litter, and it feels that by not having litter bins there it is encouraging people to take litter away with them.

“My argument is that by not having litter bins there it is encouraging people to drop litter. And I do genuinely feel that the impression that bodies such as the National Trust give, in a situation like that, is that they are completely indifferent to litter.”

He is scathing about the Trust and accuses it of being in a state of denial. “It says that a litter bin would be an intrusion, that it would spoil the bucolic scene. But it doesn’t seem to feel the same way about donation boxes. So I think it’s a difference of philosophy there, but I have to say that my experience with the National Trust in that respect is very disappointing.”

He intends to write again about the car park but said: “And again it will get me nowhere.”

A spokeswoman at the Trust said she was unable to comment about the lack of bins.

 

Bottle deposits planned to battle litter

By Sophie Borland 16/04/2008

Bottle deposits could return in a government attempt to reduce litter.

Fly-tipping is trashing countryside, says CPRE

Joan Ruddock, the minister for waste, has ordered a feasibility study of the proposals, which would see cash incentives for returning empties.

The Department for Food, Environment and Rural Affairs is keen to reduce the number of discarded bottles and cans, which it regards as the "worst litter offenders".

It is also considering reverse vending machines that would give cash back for used bottles and cans, and is talking to the makers of such machines.

The study follows suggestions from Bill Bryson, the US-born travel author, who is also president of the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE), for a take-back scheme. A similar project in his home state of Iowa saw litter reduced by 70 per cent.

He said it gave litter a value and helped groups such as the Scouts, the homeless and churches to raise funds.

Miss Ruddock said: "I have asked officials to look at how we deal with the worst litter offenders, which are bottles and cans. It may be possible to devise a scheme where people deposit used bottles and cans and get a reward. I can see the attraction of take-back schemes with a reward.

"If only we could find a way of capturing the cans of those who drink in the street so they are not thrown on the street. If people consume on the street they are extremely unlikely to take empties home. We need to find more novel and creative ways instead of ending up with overflowing bins."

She said she was particularly keen to devise ways to encourage people to return drinks cans, as aluminium is expensive and can be recycled.

She confirmed: "I am happy to look again at this issue. There was some work done a few years ago on deposit schemes but they were not seen as effective in encouraging recycling. But dealing with litter is different." There was still much work to be done.

The initiative comes as the CPRE launches its "stop the drop" campaign today to encourage the public to clean up litter.

 

INTRODUCTION OF 10P DEPOSIT SYSTEM ON PLASTIC BOTTLES

Wed 16th Apr 2008

Campaign to Protect Rural England

Councillor Nicola Turner (Liberal Democrat Member in Colne Valley Ward) is backing campaigners' calls for a 10p deposit system on plastic bottles to be introduced to help reduce waste, litter and environmental damage in Kirklees and across the UK. She also wants to see manufactures face up to their environmental responsibilities.

The Campaign to Protect Rural England is pushing the initiative with the Government as part of its "Stop the Drop" campaign (1). Under the proposal, 10p would be added to the cost of every item sold in a plastic bottle which people would then be able to redeem by dropping it off at a shop or collection point. The manufacturers would then make money by selling on the containers for recycling.

Cllr Turner says: "13 billion plastic bottles are disposed of in Britain each year with the average household in Kirklees being responsible for 500 of them. Some will end up being recycled but many, many, more, possibly up to 80%, will end up going in the general waste."

"The introduction of a 10p deposit system would provide people with a financial incentive to recycle their plastic bottles, reducing wastage and the amount of litter on our streets."

"It would also mean that manufacturers could no longer refuse to take responsibility for the waste their products produce at the end of the consumer chain. At the moment, as soon as a plastic bottle goes into the domestic waste stream it is gone and the tax payer foots the bill which is unfair. Under this scheme the bottle would be returned to the manufacturer who would either have to incur a loss themselves by paying for its disposal or look to make a profit by selling it for recycling. Up until now there has been no real incentive for manufactures to change the way they operate and so many haven't. But this has the potential to change that situation".

"Similar systems are already in place in South Australia, Germany and Sweden and the US there they are all successful and popular."

"The key to the success is to make sure that people can return their bottles to as many shops as possible or to one of many local collection points. What I wouldn't want to see is people getting in their cars to drop off their bottles. This would be counter productive."

"It's just a reinvention of the old deposit system we had on glass pop bottles. If it were introduced nationally I could see young people going out gathering up waste bottles to pocket the extra cash. So, getting young people actively involved in improving their local environment would just be another added benefit of this campaign".

Cllr Turner's support comes shortly after Kirklees Council committed itself to becoming the UK's first plastic bag free large urban council. A Liberal Democrat motion which won all party support on this issue was successfully passed in December 07.

"We want Kirklees to be the first zero waste authority in the UK. Schemes which draw attention to how much we waste and provide incentives for people to make real changes in their day-today lives must be introduced. People can lend their support to the campaign by visiting www.cpre.org.uk."

 

 

 

Campaigners call for 10p deposit on drink cans and bottles

By OLINKA KOSTER -15th April 2008

Countryside campaigners are calling for a deposit system on plastic bottles and cans to help reduce unsightly litter.

The Campaign to Protect Rural England is urging the Government to introduce a scheme which would pay out 10p for every drinks container returned.

Launching a nationwide campaign to tackle litter and fly-tipping, the CPRE praised the Daily Mail's "Banish the Bags" campaign.

This culminated in Alistair Darling's Budget announcement last month to force supermarkets to charge for single-use plastic bags unless they introduce their own voluntary charges.

Yesterday, the campaign group said that as well as throwing away hundreds of bags each year, each household disposes of 500 plastic bottles in the same period.

Only 130 of these are recycled while the rest end up in landfill or in streets, fields and hedgerows.

The deposit scheme would add 10p to the price of every bottle or can sold. This would be returned to the consumer - or anyone picking up an empty bottle or beer can in the street - either by the retailer or at a recycling collection point.

The manufacturer could make money from selling the containers for recycling, while cleaner streets would mean fewer costs to the taxpayer.

Similar schemes are already in place in South Australia, Germany, Sweden and the U.S., where 11 states have "bottle bills" with a 5 cent deposit added to the price of each drink.

"The CPRE will be lobbying the Government for more leadership to tackle litter and flytipping," said a spokesman.

"We supported the Banish the Bags campaign and the announcement in the recent Budget that supermarkets may have to charge to issue single-use plastic bags was a step in the right direction.

"We now want to see action to introduce a nationwide deposit system for drinks containers similar to that in many other countries.

"We will be making it clear we aren't happy that the Government has provided a convincing answer to this issue."

The writer Bill Bryson, who is spearheading the charity's Stop the Drop anti-littering campaign, said: "Litter is becoming the default condition of the countryside.

"It is time that all of us did something about this. The landscape is too lovely to trash.

"Of course it is vital that people do not drop litter in the first place, but local authorities, central Government and other public bodies have a duty to clear it up and should all give a much stronger lead on the problem.

"We can all put pressure on them to do so."

Last night, Minister for Waste Joan Ruddock said: "Waste solutions have to make both environmental and economic sense if they are to be successful.

"Deposit and return schemes died out in this country because they did not make financial sense.

"Until their environmental benefits are more clear cut, we are not currently persuaded that implementing them would be justified.

"We wouldn't entirely rule them out because we are looking at innovative ideas for better collection of materials that get discarded on the streets.'

 

The Independant - 12/09/2007

The Conservative Parties quality-of- life policy group,

The quality of life policy review, chaired by former environment secretary John Gummer and green campaigner Zac Goldsmith, will focus on domestic energy use, transport and taxation.

The Tories' quality-of- life policy group which publishes its final report tomorrow, will recommend council tax rebates for people who recycle their waste. Council tax bills would show people how much they pay to have their rubbish collected and waste recycled.

It also proposes measures to curb waste caused by excessive packaging. The group says this could mean consumers paying a 20p deposit for a drinks bottle which would be refunded when they returned it to a reverse-vending machine. People would bring home less food packaging from supermarkets because manufacturers would be driven to reduce unnecessary packaging by "take back" schemes. Remaining packaging would be recyclable or compostable. more >>>

Product levies and deposit refund systems

A number of countries, including Finland, Denmark, Germany and Italy, have introduced a charge on environmentally damaging products such as non-rechargeable batteries or non-refillable or nonrecyclable drinks packaging.

In most cases the charge is used to fund collection and recycling schemes, but in some cases the charge is levied explicitly to shift consumer behaviour from these products towards better alternatives – for example, better types of packaging. It could also be used to discourage one-time use, disposable products that currently can’t be recycled. Other countries such as the US have made good use of deposit – refund systems for some types of drinks packaging e.g. glass and PET bottles.

Such a system could be a popular way of encouraging the public to recycle outside the home where recycling systems are currently few and far between.

What could all this mean…

…for packaging?

_ You pay a 20 pence deposit for a drinks bottle that is refunded to you when you return it to a reverse-vending machine in your high street. Click here for full story >>>>

 

 

Call for packaging deposit scheme for Scotland
(Letsrecycle.com- The Scotsman newspaper - 20.07.06)


Deposit_System


Anti-litter crusading MSP Mike Pringle is urging the Liberal Democrats to support a proposal for a new deposit scheme for packaging in Scotland.


Mr Pringle, the man behind the bid for a plastic carrier bag levy in Scotland, hopes his party will include the deposit scheme proposal in its next election manifesto.

Writing in The Scotsman newspaper today, Mr Pringle argued that deposit schemes would provide incentives for people to hand back their old bottles and cans for recycling.

He is proposing that the scheme might involve a 10p or 20p levy on the sale of each bottled or canned product, which would be refunded to shoppers when handed in for recycling.

Mr Pringle said: "Container deposit schemes, as they are known, have proven hugely successful at reducing litter and increasing recycling in countries across the world.

Value
The Edinburgh South MSP dismissed concerns that the scheme wouldn't work, citing deposit schemes in America, Canada, Denmark, Germany and Sweden as having raised recycling rates and reduced litter.

He said: "By putting a value on bottles, we give people a real incentive to return and recycle. Those who choose not to return their bottles will miss out, but we will all benefit as unclaimed deposits would be used by councils to improve their litter and waste services."

Mr Pringle suggested that a national deposit scheme in Scotland could involve retailer recycling facilities, reverse-vending machines or alternative collection points.

"I will be pressing for the policy to be in the next Liberal Democrat manifesto. It's time to go back to the future and use an old idea for a new purpose," he concluded".

See Also: (The Scotsman Thu 20 Jul 2006)

Have we the bottle to make a change?

THE issues of tackling climate change and protecting our environment are increasingly at the top of the political and public agenda - and rightly so.

http://news.scotsman.com/opinion.cfm?id=1055882006

Reverse Vending Corporation Ltd (RVC)

Deposit Systems

Returpack is responsible for the administration and deposit system for aluminium ... United Kingdom ) Deposit Systems for used beverage containers in the UK ...
www.reversevending.co.uk/deposit_systems.php

Deposit Administration Systems

Used in Europe for over three decades, In most cases Reverse Vending Machines are used in markets that have deposits on beverage containers, offering a highly efficient method of identifying the deposit amount of each container returned and providing a refund to the customer.

Reverse Vending Corporation's team of software developers ( in house) are able to supply the Full Deposit System and data base structure , as used in numerous European "Deposit " Systems, including the full data base of EAN Codes used in Mainland Europe.

Enabling all stakeholders limited "password protected" access to just data within the Central Administration database etc

ycling Machines © 2007


Reverse Vending is available in the UK Contact : Reverse Vending Systems for further information or email info@reversevending.co.uk

Reverse Vending Corporation , A UK distributor and operator of automated machines that utilise advanced technology to identify, sort, collect and process used Beverage Containers
www.reversevending.co.uk/

Reverse Vending Systems

Reverse Vending Corporation is the leading UK distributor and operator of Reverse Vending machines that utilise advanced technology to identify, sort, ...
www.reversevending.co.uk

Bottle Bill Resource Guide - U.S. bottle bills

California's bottle bill

Delaware's bottle bill

Hawaii's bottle bill

Iowa's bottle bill

Maine's bottle bill

Massachusetts' bottle bill

Michigan's bottle bill

New York's bottle bill

Oregon's bottle bill

Vermont's bottle bill

General information about container deposit programs and legisalation:

Bottle Bill Resource Guide

Tennessee's proposed bottle billTennessee Legislature

Norsk Resirk AS (Norway)
http://www.resirk.no/

A non-profit organization owned by Norwegian retail groups and breweries, Norsk Resirk administers the deposit refund system on cans and PET in Norway. Site languages: Norwegian and English.

Palpa Ltd. (Finland)
http://www.palpa.fi/

Owned by Finnish commercial groups and breweries, Palpa manages the recycling of beverage containers in Finland. Site languages: Finnish, Swedish and English.

AB Svenska Returpack (Sweden)
http://www.returpack.se/

Returpack is an organization owned by the Swedish brewery industry, retail industry and beverage packaging industry, and is responsible for the administration of the refund system for aluminium cans and one-way PET bottles in Sweden. Site languages: Swedish and English.

Dansk Retursystem A/S (Denmark)
http://www.dansk-retursystem.dk/

Dansk Retursystem is a private company that has been granted the exclusive right to operate the Danish return system.

www.reversevending.co.uk

Reverse Vending in Wales

Have we the bottle to make a change?
Scotsman, United Kingdom - 20 Jul 2006
... My scheme could work in a number of ways, including using retailers, reverse vending machines or alternative collection points. ...

letsrecycle.com
Call for packaging deposit scheme for Scotland
letsrecycle.com, UK - 20 Jul 2006
... Mr Pringle suggested that a national deposit scheme in Scotland could involve retailer recycling facilities, reverse-vending machines or alternative collection ...

hit counter

Last updated March 2009

Disclaimer:
By providing links to other sites,we DO NOT guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites. also, the provision of these links does not  indicate that the organizations publishing the linked websites endorse Island Wharf

Copyright 1999-2009 - ISLAND WHARF . All Rights Reserved. /www.island-wharf.com/